Signs of the Times Magazine  
  Home Archives Topics Podcast Subscribe Special Offers About SIGNS Contact Us Links  
   

Signs of the Times Australia / NZ edition — lifestyle, health, relationships, culture, spirituality, people — published since 1886

A Theology of Tree Hugging

Christians should be able to out-hug any tree-hugger. But it’s not just about the tree, says Signs editor Nathan Brown.

In 1992, 1700 of the world’s leading scientists—including 104 Nobel laureates—met to consider the state of the natural world. At the conclusion of their gathering, they issued a grave warning: “A great change in our stewardship of the earth and the life on it is required, if vast human misery is to be avoided and our global home on this planet is not to be irretrievably mutilated.”1

While there may be some quibbling about the edges of our looming environmental tragedies, the broad-scale realities are increasingly beyond debate. Faced with the degradation of so many aspects of the natural world, it’s significant that these eminent scientists, many of whom would be considered (and consider themselves) nonbelievers, should employ a term such as “stewardship” to describe our relationship with the world around us. It’s a word that should awaken echoes of humanity’s God-assigned role at Creation. Unfortunately, it’s a warning that demands a change of attitude for too many Christians and Christian organisations.

For too long, the emphasis has been on the exploitative connotations of God’s charge to humanity at Creation: “Multiply and fill the earth and subdue it. Be masters over the fish and birds and all the animals” (Genesis 1:28*). To many—both inside and outside Christianity—this is the assumed Christian attitude to the world around us: subdue and master; use and abuse. But this ignores the more tempered and stewardly tone of the next chapter: “God placed the man in the Garden of Eden to tend and care for it” (Genesis 2:15). It’s a different way of interacting with the world.

living carefully

Significantly, the gathered scientists called for a profound change, not just fine adjustment. So much of how we live our lives is unsustainable, self-centred and simply wrong. In much of the Western world and perhaps even more broadly, “We are engaged in a mania of consumption” says author Thomas Hine. “More and more people own houses that are larger and larger, and ever more crowded with stuff.”2

And while some of us may espouse the fashionable garb of environmental concern, most of our lives deny the reality of God’s creation and our responsibilities. Says Norman Wirzba: “Much of our contemporary creative work seems to presuppose an absurd or meaningless world, a world in which particular acts matter very little or have no larger significance. Our practices, as when we engineer or modify habitats and organisms or when we produce shoddy, cheap and therefore wasteful products, suggest we see the universe as ours to do with as we please.”3

Such an attitude is profoundly anti-Christian, Wirzba claims. “The scriptural view that the whole of creation belongs to God and that our role within creation is limited, but also ennobled, to that of steward or servant seems to make little practical difference in the way many people order their lives.”4 Whatever attitude we may adopt or preach is worthless in the face of contradictory practical living.

Yet we are enmeshed in a self-defeating and planet-destroying culture and economy. Responding as Christians to the “mania of consumption” with which we are surrounded may not always be straightforward, but to minimise our participation as much as possible is a first step.

Dallas Willard gives a useful attitude for personal living—“a gentle but firm non-cooperation with things that everyone knows to be wrong.”5 In the context of environmental degradation, there are some big-picture issues that everyone knows to be wrong: “Economies built on destruction and exhaustion must be replaced with economies that model hospitality and care. We need to see that our economic lives give the most honest portrayal of how we understand salvation.”

celebrating life; celebrating God

But, perhaps, our first task—before we get down to serious business of environmentalism—is to reclaim the wonder of creation. The Bible is filled with the celebration of the natural world—both by God, such as in Job 38-41, and people, such as Psalm 148. Jesus, too, drew from the natural world examples of God’s goodness and care (for example, Matthew 6:26, 28-30), commending both our reliance on God and an appreciation of the simple gifts that surround us with wonder.

Former prominent American agriculturalist Liberty Hyde Bailey recognised this unique relationship between a follower of Christ and the natural world, arguing that “a man cannot be a good farmer unless he is a religious man.” And possibly a good farmer—or those who live with such an appropriately steward-like attitude—is one most amenable to the religious aspect of life: “To live intimately and sympathetically with the earth is to see that we are surrounded and sustained by gifts on every side and to acknowledge that the only proper response to this unfathomable kindness is our own attention, care and gratitude,” says Wirzba.7

In much of the Western world, we live in an artificial, unsustainable and thus unreal environment. We have cut ourselves off from the real world from which we draw our life. Sometimes the holiest, most profound and most important moments in our lives must be watching a sunset, feeling the rain, listening to a chorus of frogs or even hugging a tree. There is a vital sacramental aspect of engaging with the natural world—a celebration of the abundant creativity of God.

“for God so loved the world . . .”

As stewards of God’s creation—“those who are gentle and lowly” and as such “the whole earth will belong to them” (Matthew 5:5)—we should have a pre-eminently global focus. We no longer need to ask, “Who is my neighbour?” (Luke 10:29). We live with an increasing realisation that we are all in this together: “There is, in practice, no such thing as autonomy,” suggests Wendell Berry.8 “Practically speaking there’s only a distinction between responsible and irresponsible dependence.” We must be alert to the prospect—and reality—of “vast human misery” and acknowledge that they are us.

We are undeniably interdependent. How we live in comparative affluence impacts directly and indirectly on the lives of millions of others and on the limited resources of our world. As responsible stewards, we should be using the many choices in our lives, our consumer power and our political voice to work against the blind disregard of environmental responsibility in much of the Western world.

When Jesus said, “For God so loved the world” (John 3:16), He used the widest possible meaning of “the world.” This includes all the people of the world and may well also extend to the natural world. Such an all-encompassing view of salvation is suggested by Paul’s assertion that “all creation anticipates the day when it will join God’s children in glorious freedom from death and decay” (Romans 8:21). In light of such texts, even those who see some kind of apocalyptic sense in the destruction of our natural world must ask themselves whether God has some bigger purpose.

Christian tree-hugging

Because of the prevalence of the “Christian” subdue-and-master attitude, Christianity is often positioned among the antitheses of environmentalism. In many intellectual circles, Christianity is deemed synonymous with capitalism, consumerism, industrialism, imperialism and even militarism. In reality, Christianity should be at the forefront of protest against all selfish and destructive attitudes and practices. As stewards of the earth, servants of all humanity and disciples of Jesus, we must be agents of an all-embracing change in our world.

Environmental activists have often been lampooned as “tree-huggers.” But if that’s what is needed to restore a sense of connectedness to the natural world—and precipitate the urgent steps that will follow from a renewal of that realisation—Christianity should be setting the example. Christians should be able to out-hug any tree-hugger. But it’s not just about the tree. When we realise it’s about the tree, the life it supports, each of our fellow tree-huggers and ourselves—all the work of an all-loving Creator—then tree-hugging and all that the term has come to represent will be rightly regarded as among the most significant acts of worship.

* Bible quotations are from the New Living Translation.
1. “World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity,” <www.ucsusa.org>.
2. Thomas Hine, I Want That: How We All Became Shoppers—A Cultural History, HarperCollins, page 158.
3. Norman Wirzba, The Paradise of God: Renewing Religion in an Ecological Age, Oxford University Press, 2003, page 14.
4. ibid, pages 14, 15.
5. The Divine Conspiracy, Fount, page 313.
6. Wirzba, op cit, page 20.
7. ibid, page 72.
8. ibid, page 77, quoting Wendell Berry.

This is an extract from
June 2004


Signs of the Times Magazine
Australia New Zealand edition.


Questions / comments? Talk to us!


Home - Archive - Topics - Podcast - Subscribe - Special Offers - About Signs - Contact Us - Links

Signs Publishing Company Seventh-day Adventist Church

Copyright © 2004-2010 Seventh-day Adventist Church (SPD) Limited ACN 093 117 689